Ornaments as proxy for reconstructing social networks from Iberia Mesolithic hunter-gatherers
Carolina Cucart-Mora  1@  , Valéria Romano  1@  , Javier Fernández-López De Pablo  1@  , Sergi Lozano  2@  , Magdalena Gómez-Puche  1@  
1 : Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Arqueología y Patrimonio Histórico, University of Alicante  (INAPH, UA)  -  Website
Edificio Institutos Universitarios-Parque Científico, Planta Baja Carretera de San Vicente del Raspeig, s/n. 03690 - San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante) -  Espagne
2 : Department of Economic History, Institutions and Policy and World Economy. University of Barcelona  (UB)  -  Website
Faculty of Economics and Business Diagonal, 690 08034 Barcelona -  Espagne

Archaeologists and ethnographers have long suggested that certain artifacts classes may be especially useful to investigate shared identities or shared social practices due to their symbolic meaning or style (Peeples, 2019). Among these artifacts, personal ornaments are perceived by members of hunter-gatherers (HG) societies as an indicator of their ethnic identity, enhancing within-group cohesion and contributing to drawing the boundaries with neighboring groups (Newell et al., 1990; Wobst, 1977). Although ornaments provide great inference on HG's social connectivity, the refined assessment of the social structure through means of Social Network Analysis (SNA) has been overlooked in archaeology (Romano et al., 2020). We use this innovative approach to formally reconstruct HG networks in the Iberian Peninsula throughout early Holocene. Developed within the scope of the ERC project PALEODEM (ERC-GoG-2015 Ref.683018), which aims at studying Late Glacial and Postglacial population history and cultural transmission in Iberia, this communication presents the preliminary results from a case study that formally applies SNA methods on the Mesolithic archaeological record. First, we assume that the greater the similarity between ornament assemblages, the greater the likelihood of shared social relations (Mills, 2017). Second, matrices of similarity based on ornaments assemblage are used to create two weighted and undirected networks: one corresponding to the Early Mesolithic and the other to the Late Mesolithic. Next, networks are characterized according to their microscopic (i.e. relevance of regional groups within the network) and macroscopic (e.g. how densely connected is the network) features. Last, we compare their structural properties and track potential changes throughout time. With this study case, we hope to contribute to a deeper understanding of the patterns of socio‐spatial structure of HG during the Mesolithic, which ultimately may provide insights into the mechanisms behind the significant cultural changes documented in the Iberian Peninsula during the same period.

Key words: Mesolithic; Social Network Analysis; Iberian Peninsula

 

References

Mills, B. J. (2017). Social Network Analysis in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46(1), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041423

Newell, R. R., Kielman, D., Constandse-Westermann, T. S., von der Sanden, W. A. B., & van Gijn, A. (1990). An Inquiry into the ethnic resolution of Mesolithic regional groups : the study of their decorative ornaments in time and space (E.J. Brill). E.J. Brill. https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999628313002121

Peeples, M. A. (2019). Finding a Place for Networks in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research, 27(4), 451–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-019-09127-8

Romano, V., Lozano, S., & Fernández-López de Pablo, J. (2020). A multilevel analytical framework for studying cultural evolution in prehistoric hunter-gatherer societies. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12599

Wobst, H. M. (1977). Stylistic behaviour and information exchange. In C. E. Cleland, J. B. Griffin, & U. of Michigan (Eds.), For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin: Vol. Anthropolo (pp. 317–342). Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.


Online user: 1 RSS Feed